Compared to the other languages I attempted to learn as a kid, Esperanto was easy. Already knowing German, English, Latin and some Russian meant that I was familiar with the vocabulary, since most words in Esperanto have their origin in the Germanic and Romance languages. The regular structure of the grammar meant that I could learn the basics in an afternoon. Another thing that helped was that my grandfather had been a leading member of the Esperanto community in the mid-20th century. He had written on the topic extensively and there were several Esperanto dictionaries in our house. He had died many years before I was born and we never met each other, but I believe that there is something in the way my mind is formed that is similar to his, and that this something attracted both of us to Esperanto.
Most of all I liked the idea of starting a language from scratch. By creating a new language, it’s possible to jettison the inefficiencies and illogical aspects of the old ones. It’s the same thing I like about Quikscript, a constructed alphabet. More generally, I enjoy thinking about what it’d take to start parts of our civilization from scratch, even though I have learned since that those attempts will fail, and that even if they had some success, replacing the old, organically grown ways is likely to backfire in unforeseen ways.
One response to “Esperanto”
[…] The one dimension that has escaped the metric system is time. The International System of Units defines the second as the unit of time, but we still use minutes, hours, days, weeks, months and years. Nobody uses kiloseconds. Decimal time would make more sense and was tried after the French Revolution. It didn’t take, and now it’s too late to start over. […]
LikeLike